If a 22 year old man had a consensual sexual relationship with an 18 year old woman, would that make him a sex offender? What if the 22 year old were a teacher at the local comprehensive and his partner a sixth former? Would that make a difference? Should it make a difference?
The teachers’ union NASUWT has claimed that is is an ‘anomaly’ that a teacher who had consenting sex with a pupil aged over 16 could go on the sex offenders register. Since 2001, it has been against the law for a teacher to engage in sexual activity with a pupil at their school, regardless of whether than pupil is over the legal age of consent. If convicted, the teacher would be placed on the sex offenders register and be subject to all the restrictions that that brings. However a teacher can legally enter a relationship with a sixth former at another school.
General Secretary of NASUWT, Christine Keates said the abuse of trust law had gone too far in cases where the relationship started after a pupil had reached the age of consent. She said:
“If a teacher has a relationship with a pupil at the school at which they teach, it could be an 18 year old pupil in sixth form, then that teacher can be prosecuted and end up on the sex offenders register.
“Clearly there have to be appropriate disciplinary sanctions in the school where a teacher works to make sure that inappropriate relationships don’t develop. But it does seem a step too far, when there has been a consensual relationship, to put that person on the sex offenders register when, in fact, they could have a perfectly legitimate relationship with an 18-year-old at another school.”
However child protection professionals have criticised her comments. Zoe Hilton from the NSPCC said: “The law is very clear that if a teacher abuses his or her position by forming a sexual relationship with a pupil they could be prosecuted and this remains the case even if the child gives their consent.”
There’s only one part of Ms Hilton’s statement with which I would disagree - an 18 year old is not a child, even if they are still in full-time education. The issue here is not one of a sexual offender, but that of an abuse of trust. Whilst a teacher is said to be acting ‘in loco parentis’, a relationship between a pupil and a teacher cannot be compared to incest. Such a relationship is certainly unethical, but should it be illegal?
At the moment, a 55 year old manager can have a sexual relationship with their 16 year old office junior and it’s no big deal, whilst the manager’s 23 year old son will lose his entire future if he has a relationship with an 18 year old pupil at the school at which he teaches, regardless of whether he has any contact with the pupil during the school day. Whilst abusing a position of trust must be dealt in any profession, how does being a teacher turn you into a legally defined pervert?
The Daily Moral and its internet readers have of course seen this as a green light for paedophiles. They use to illustrate the story a photo of someone who was 15 when ’seduced’ by their drama teacher, rather than someone who was over the age of consent. Comments elsewhere are more mixed, with a number of respondents agreeing that the teacher should be disciplined, sacked maybe, but not prosecuted or placed on the register.
Of course a relationship of a teacher with a pupil is an abuse of trust, just as that of an Army Major with a Corporal. Both should be professionally forbidden. Relationships of this type can cause problems elsewhere and in other professions, such as policing and banking, one half of a relationship will be moved to another location. In many offices, any line management relationship would be ended. But a consensual relationship between two adults able to consent cannot be abuse, nor can one of the partners be classified as a sex offender. Maybe we can start to drop the hysteria which sees ‘perverts’ everywhere and concentrate on the real offenders, rather than trivialising what the sex offenders register is there for.
ITV’s Tonight: To Sir With Love will be broadcast on ITV1 tonight at 8pm.





8 responses so far ↓
1 Stephen Glenn // Oct 6, 2008 at 15:26
Very interesting points raised there Sara.
Just why is one profession deeming it an offence between people of the age of consent why others do not? Yes there should be terms of work to mitigate against it but making it an offence universially is clearly another case of over policing by the wrong people, ie the police rather than the employers.
2 Tazia // Oct 6, 2008 at 19:00
It is U18 actually, the O18 relates to learning difficulties, if we give into the NASUWT’s Japanese fetish porno demands, one will have to give foster parents the right to sleep with foster children. The NASUWT are also worried about the associated child pornography convictions. No crime, no cops, no seach warrant.
3 The excitement mounts … // Oct 6, 2008 at 23:21
[...] Should sex with an eighteen year old make you a sex offender? [...]
4 Peter Welch // Oct 7, 2008 at 9:46
“a 55 year old manager can have a sexual relationship with their 16 year old office junior and it’s no big deal”.
True that s/he won’t go on the sexual offenders register - but certainly in big danger of a sexual harassment case.
5 Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #86 | Liberal Democrat Voice // Oct 12, 2008 at 20:50
[...] Should sex with an eighteen year old make you a sex offender? on Sara Bedford’s Always win when you’re singing blog. “Of course a relationship of a [...]
6 Mike Falchikov // Oct 24, 2008 at 1:23
No, it shouldn’t be a criminal offence. Unethical,unprofessional, perhaps meriting professional sanctions , but not criminal. And especially it should not be an excuse for putting the “offender” on the Sex Offenders’ Register. This is becoming a catch-all sanction for any behaviour that might cause offence to a third party e.g. the couple caught, apparently by a zealous policeman, having sex on a canal towpath. Who was offended?
The policeman apparently. Pull the other one!
7 Tazia // Nov 10, 2008 at 1:03
They also want a free pass for rape of 12 and 14 year olds. They want immunity. The NASUWT are very sick puppies.
They mostly get a free pass anyway. Outraging public decency won’t make the SOR, or be a bar to teaching. Even child pornography filming doesn’t always do it, and if one is a pedo who likes little boys, one can get to teach little girls, Brit teachers are already the most pampered in the world. They rarely get more than a jovial word in the ear for using schoolgirls for recreational purposes.
Time to teach these predators a REAL lesson
Daily Mail, UK - 16 Oct 2008
Are our jails so full that creepy teachers and the kind of immoral adults who sexually prey on vulnerable children - and they are children - are sent home …
8 Tazia // Nov 10, 2008 at 1:07
“Just why is one profession deeming it an offence between people of the age of consent why others do not? ”
One would have to legalize 16 year old hard core porn, and legalize foster fathers having sex with foster daughters, and police officers, jail guards, they are asking for the decriminalization of abuse of trust.
Are deviant Catholic priests the *only* sex offenders? In the UK, teachers *are* the child prostitution problem. The NASUWT are akin to NAMBLA, they know what they want.
Leave a Comment